feat: add generated scene skill platform hardening
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
# G6 Host-Bridge Execution Semantics Report
|
||||
|
||||
> Date: 2026-04-19
|
||||
> Plan: [2026-04-19-g6-host-bridge-execution-semantics-plan.md](D:/data/ideaSpace/rust/sgClaw/claw-new/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-19-g6-host-bridge-execution-semantics-plan.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Result
|
||||
|
||||
This bounded slice separates the `G6` blocked capability into two explicit semantics:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `host-bridge-action-invocation`
|
||||
2. `callback-request-completion`
|
||||
|
||||
## What Was Isolated
|
||||
|
||||
The existing generated `G6` runtime shape already exposes two semantic seams:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `invokeHostBridge`
|
||||
2. `callbackEndpoints` and callback result accumulation
|
||||
|
||||
So this slice does not treat `G6` as a broad runtime-platform gap anymore.
|
||||
|
||||
It treats `G6` as a bounded semantic modeling problem.
|
||||
|
||||
## Explicit Non-Goal
|
||||
|
||||
This slice does not broaden into:
|
||||
|
||||
1. host-runtime transport rebuild
|
||||
2. `G6` real-sample execution
|
||||
3. `G8` work
|
||||
|
||||
## Follow-Up
|
||||
|
||||
The next bounded step is:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `G6 host-bridge callback semantics`
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user