# Remaining Route Conflict Correction Design > Date: 2026-04-19 > Status: Draft > Upstream Report: `docs/superpowers/reports/2026-04-19-102-full-sweep-improvement-coverage-delta-report.md` ## Design Intent Resolve the remaining `4` route conflicts from the follow-up `102` sweep without reopening the broader full-sweep improvement roadmap. The design answers: `which of the remaining G3/G2 vs host_bridge_workflow conflicts should be corrected, and which should be formally adjudicated as valid host-bridge workflows?` ## Fixed Input The fixed input set is exactly the `4` misclassified records from `tests/fixtures/generated_scene/full_sweep_improvement_followup_2026-04-19.json`: | Scene | Expected group | Expected archetype | Current inferred archetype | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | `95598报修工单日管控` | `G3` | `paginated_enrichment` | `host_bridge_workflow` | | `95598重要服务事项报备统计表` | `G3` | `paginated_enrichment` | `host_bridge_workflow` | | `台区线损台区月度高负损预测` | `G2` | `multi_mode_request` | `host_bridge_workflow` | | `配网支撑月报(95598抢修统计报表)` | `G3` | `paginated_enrichment` | `host_bridge_workflow` | ## Scope Guardrails 1. do not add new scene families 2. do not reopen timeout work 3. do not reopen readiness-before-report work 4. do not update `scene_execution_board_2026-04-18.json` 5. do not promote scenes automatically 6. do not weaken `G6` host-bridge real-sample pass 7. do not weaken `G2` or `G3` canonical / real-sample pass 8. do not make `host_bridge_workflow` lose when it is the only complete contract ## Route Decision Model Each conflict must be assigned exactly one final route decision: 1. `route-corrected-to-g3` 2. `route-corrected-to-g2` 3. `valid-host-bridge-workflow` 4. `board-expectation-stale` 5. `route-conflict-unresolved` ## Evidence Rules ### G3 Wins Over G6 Only When 1. business endpoint evidence is present 2. pagination evidence is present 3. response path evidence is present 4. at least one of enrichment, join-key, or export workflow evidence is present 5. host bridge evidence is subordinate rather than the only execution path ### G2 Wins Over G6 Only When 1. line-loss / electricity business signal is present 2. mode or prediction signal is present 3. request contract can be inferred 4. host bridge evidence is subordinate rather than the only execution path ### G6 Remains Valid When 1. host bridge action is the only complete execution path 2. callback / localhost dependency dominates the workflow 3. business-chain evidence does not close the expected G2/G3 contract ## Expected Deliverables 1. route conflict decision JSON 2. route conflict correction report 3. bounded routing regression tests if implementation correction is needed 4. follow-up probe result for the same `4` records ## Completion Criteria This design is complete when: 1. all `4` conflicts have explicit final decisions 2. corrected routes are verified by targeted generation probes 3. valid host-bridge cases remain documented rather than forced into G2/G3 4. existing `G2/G3/G6` regressions still pass ## Out of Scope 1. full `102` sweep rerun unless explicitly required after route correction 2. timeout optimization 3. new family creation 4. login / host runtime implementation 5. execution board status sync