# Remaining Route Conflict Correction Report

> Date: 2026-04-19
> Plan: `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-19-remaining-route-conflict-correction-plan.md`
> Decision Asset: `tests/fixtures/generated_scene/remaining_route_conflict_decisions_2026-04-19.json`

## Scope

This report covers only the `4` route conflicts from the follow-up full sweep.

No timeout handling, structured fail-closed reporting, family baseline, or execution-board status was changed by this plan.

## Final Decisions

| Scene | Expected group | Previous inferred archetype | Final decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `95598报修工单日管控` | `G3` | `host_bridge_workflow` | `valid-host-bridge-workflow` |
| `95598重要服务事项报备统计表` | `G3` | `host_bridge_workflow` | `valid-host-bridge-workflow` |
| `台区线损台区月度高负损预测` | `G2` | `host_bridge_workflow` | `valid-host-bridge-workflow` |
| `配网支撑月报(95598抢修统计报表)` | `G3` | `host_bridge_workflow` | `valid-host-bridge-workflow` |

## Decision Rationale

The targeted probes showed that the expected `G3` or `G2` contracts do not close for these scenes:

1. the `G3` cases lack a closed main request, pagination plan, enrichment request, or join key
2. the `G2` case lacks a closed mode matrix and mode-specific request contracts
3. `host_bridge_workflow` remains the only complete execution path for all four scenes

Therefore, this plan does not force the scenes back into `G3` or `G2`.

## Verification

Targeted probes were run for exactly the fixed `4` records.

Regression checks:

1. `cargo test --test scene_generator_test -- --nocapture`
2. `cargo test --test scene_generator_canonical_test -- --nocapture`

Both passed.

## Implementation Result

No analyzer route patch was required by the evidence adjudication.

The route conflict is resolved as a board-expectation/adjudication issue, not a generator bug to be patched in this plan.

## Stop Statement

This plan stops here.

It does not update `scene_execution_board_2026-04-18.json`, does not promote any scene, and does not open another plan.