Files
claw/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-19-102-sweep-status-reconciliation-design.md

4.3 KiB

102 Sweep Status Reconciliation Design

Date: 2026-04-19 Status: Draft Upstream Follow-Up Sweep: tests/fixtures/generated_scene/full_sweep_improvement_followup_2026-04-19.json Upstream Route Decisions: tests/fixtures/generated_scene/remaining_route_conflict_decisions_2026-04-19.json

Intent

Create a single reconciled status view after the 102 full-sweep improvement roadmap and the remaining route-conflict adjudication.

This design does not change generation behavior. It reconciles measurement assets so the next roadmap starts from a trustworthy status baseline instead of reading stale misclassified counts from the follow-up sweep.

Problem

The current assets intentionally remain separated:

  1. the original execution board records current scene status
  2. the follow-up sweep records measured analyzer/generator results
  3. the route-conflict decision asset adjudicates the remaining 4 sweep misclassifications

Because the follow-up sweep still contains 4 misclassified records, a reader can incorrectly treat them as unresolved route bugs. The later route-conflict plan decided all 4 are valid-host-bridge-workflow.

The next step needs a reconciled view that preserves the raw sweep result while adding the final adjudicated state.

Scope

In scope:

  1. merge follow-up sweep records with route-conflict decisions
  2. produce reconciled status counts
  3. mark the 4 previous misclassifications as adjudicated-valid-host-bridge
  4. preserve the 2 remaining timeouts as unresolved timeout inputs
  5. summarize the 48 structured fail-closed records by archetype and blocker
  6. produce a reconciliation report for the next roadmap

Out of scope:

  1. modifying analyzer.rs
  2. modifying generator.rs
  3. modifying scene_execution_board_2026-04-18.json
  4. promoting any scene
  5. creating or changing family baselines
  6. rerunning the 102 sweep
  7. implementing fixes for fail-closed records or timeouts

Inputs

Required inputs:

  1. tests/fixtures/generated_scene/full_sweep_improvement_followup_2026-04-19.json
  2. tests/fixtures/generated_scene/remaining_route_conflict_decisions_2026-04-19.json

Optional read-only inputs:

  1. tests/fixtures/generated_scene/scene_execution_board_2026-04-18.json
  2. docs/superpowers/reports/2026-04-19-102-full-sweep-improvement-coverage-delta-report.md
  3. docs/superpowers/reports/2026-04-19-remaining-route-conflict-correction-report.md

Reconciled Status Model

Every scene keeps its raw follow-up dryRunStatus.

The reconciliation adds reconciledStatus:

  1. auto-pass
  2. fail-closed-known
  3. adjudicated-valid-host-bridge
  4. source-unreadable
  5. missing-source
  6. unsupported-family

The only status transformation in this plan is:

misclassified + route decision valid-host-bridge-workflow -> adjudicated-valid-host-bridge

If a misclassified record has no matching final decision, it must remain misclassified-unresolved.

Expected Reconciled Counts

Based on the current follow-up sweep and route decisions, the expected reconciliation is:

Reconciled status Count
auto-pass 48
fail-closed-known 48
adjudicated-valid-host-bridge 4
source-unreadable 2
missing-source 0
unsupported-family 0
Total 102

Follow-Up Inputs for Future Roadmaps

The reconciliation should make the next candidates explicit:

  1. 48 structured fail-closed records for workflow evidence / contract completion analysis
  2. 2 remaining timeout records for source-scale or command hang diagnostics
  3. 4 valid-host-bridge adjudications for optional execution-board expectation cleanup, not analyzer correction

Deliverables

  1. tests/fixtures/generated_scene/full_sweep_status_reconciliation_2026-04-19.json
  2. docs/superpowers/reports/2026-04-19-102-sweep-status-reconciliation-report.md

Acceptance Criteria

  1. total reconciled scene count is exactly 102
  2. all 4 route conflicts are reconciled from misclassified to adjudicated-valid-host-bridge
  3. no misclassified status remains unless it lacks a route decision
  4. the 2 timeout cases remain separate and unresolved
  5. no execution board status is changed
  6. no analyzer or generator logic is changed

Stop Rule

Stop after publishing the reconciliation JSON and report.

Do not start fail-closed implementation, timeout diagnostics, or execution-board sync inside this plan.