3.2 KiB
G6 Real-Sample Entry Preparation And Bounded Execution Design
Date: 2026-04-19 Status: Draft Replaces Further G6 Micro-Planning: use this design as the single surviving
G6design reference
1. Intent
This design replaces the previous over-split G6 micro-planning chain with one implementation-oriented bounded design.
The target is:
G6 real-sample entry preparation and bounded execution
2. Why This Redesign Exists
The prior G6 work was split too finely into:
- prerequisites
- execution semantics
- callback semantics
- callback-state verification
- entry readiness
- entry gate
That chain produced useful conclusions, but it also created planning recursion.
This redesign stops that recursion.
The older G6 planning documents are now treated only as input material, not as separate execution tracks.
3. Preserved Inputs
The only conclusions preserved from the earlier G6 planning chain are:
G6already has classification, family preservation, and a minimum runtime-contract shape- the remaining pressure is
host bridge real execution semantics - callback completion states are already explicit:
blockederrorpartialok
- the future
G6fail-close reasons are already explicit:g6_bridge_invocation_semantics_missingg6_callback_completion_semantics_missingg6_callback_state_targets_missing
No further G6 semantic sub-plans should be opened for the same topic.
4. Scope Boundary
This design is limited to one bounded G6 mainline preparation-and-execution slice.
It may include:
- freezing one final
G6entry gate - implementing one minimum host-bridge execution seam
- running one fixed
G6real sample - writing back one bounded validation result
It must not include:
- opening more
G6semantic sub-plans - reopening
G7 - opening
G8 - opening
G4 / G5 - broad host-runtime platform redesign
- multi-sample
G6family expansion
5. Fixed Target
This design allows only one G6 fixed real-sample anchor.
The exact sample must remain the existing G6 representative real sample already referenced by current boundary-family materials.
No second G6 real sample may be introduced under this design.
6. Target Outcome
The bounded target outcome is only one of two states:
executed-passnamed mismatch
The design explicitly rejects a third outcome of “write another semantic clarification plan”.
7. Stop Conditions
This redesign introduces hard stop conditions:
- once the fixed
G6real sample is executed, no newG6semantic sub-plan may be created - if the result is
mismatch, only an implementation correction plan may follow - if the result is
executed-pass, theG6line closes immediately
8. Execution Shape
The single surviving G6 execution shape is:
- freeze the final entry gate
- implement the minimum host-bridge execution seam
- run the fixed real sample once
- update validation assets and close
9. Exit Condition
This design is complete when one bounded plan exists that:
- freezes the final
G6gate - moves directly into implementation
- runs one fixed real sample
- closes with
executed-passornamed mismatch