Remaining Route Conflict Correction Report

Date: 2026-04-19 Plan: docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-19-remaining-route-conflict-correction-plan.md Decision Asset: tests/fixtures/generated_scene/remaining_route_conflict_decisions_2026-04-19.json

Scope

This report covers only the 4 route conflicts from the follow-up full sweep.

No timeout handling, structured fail-closed reporting, family baseline, or execution-board status was changed by this plan.

Final Decisions

Scene	Expected group	Previous inferred archetype	Final decision
`95598报修工单日管控`	`G3`	`host_bridge_workflow`	`valid-host-bridge-workflow`
`95598重要服务事项报备统计表`	`G3`	`host_bridge_workflow`	`valid-host-bridge-workflow`
`台区线损台区月度高负损预测`	`G2`	`host_bridge_workflow`	`valid-host-bridge-workflow`
`配网支撑月报(95598抢修统计报表)`	`G3`	`host_bridge_workflow`	`valid-host-bridge-workflow`

Decision Rationale

The targeted probes showed that the expected G3 or G2 contracts do not close for these scenes:

the G3 cases lack a closed main request, pagination plan, enrichment request, or join key
the G2 case lacks a closed mode matrix and mode-specific request contracts
host_bridge_workflow remains the only complete execution path for all four scenes

Therefore, this plan does not force the scenes back into G3 or G2.

Verification

Targeted probes were run for exactly the fixed 4 records.

Regression checks:

cargo test --test scene_generator_test -- --nocapture
cargo test --test scene_generator_canonical_test -- --nocapture

Both passed.

Implementation Result

No analyzer route patch was required by the evidence adjudication.

The route conflict is resolved as a board-expectation/adjudication issue, not a generator bug to be patched in this plan.

Stop Statement

This plan stops here.

It does not update scene_execution_board_2026-04-18.json, does not promote any scene, and does not open another plan.

2.0 KiB Raw Blame History