Files
claw/docs/superpowers/reports/2026-04-19-timeout-rerun-hygiene-integration-report.md

64 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown

# Timeout Rerun Hygiene Integration Report
> Date: 2026-04-19
> Plan: `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-19-timeout-rerun-hygiene-integration-plan.md`
> Follow-up input: `tests/fixtures/generated_scene/structured_fail_closed_improvement_followup_2026-04-19.json`
> Hygiene input: `tests/fixtures/generated_scene/timeout_budget_rerun_hygiene_2026-04-19.json`
## Scope
This integration only changes the reporting and reconciliation interpretation layer.
It does not:
1. change analyzer or generator code
2. rerun the `102` sweep
3. update `scene_execution_board_2026-04-18.json`
4. promote scenes
5. start timeout implementation fixes
## Raw Follow-Up Timeout Summary
The raw follow-up sweep still reports:
| Raw status | Count |
| --- | ---: |
| `source-unreadable` | 3 |
## Hygiene-Aware Timeout Interpretation
After applying the timeout rerun hygiene overlay, the same three records become:
| Hygiene interpretation | Count |
| --- | ---: |
| `timeout-as-pass-candidate` | 2 |
| `timeout-as-fail-closed-candidate` | 1 |
| `timeout-still-unreadable` | 0 |
| `timeout-rerun-error` | 0 |
## Overlay Records
| Scene id | Scene | Raw status | Hygiene status | Hygiene interpretation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `sweep-015-scene` | `????` | `source-unreadable` | `rerun-resolved-pass` | `timeout-as-pass-candidate` |
| `sweep-025-scene` | `??????????` | `source-unreadable` | `rerun-resolved-pass` | `timeout-as-pass-candidate` |
| `sweep-040-scene` | `?????` | `source-unreadable` | `rerun-resolved-fail-closed` | `timeout-as-fail-closed-candidate` |
## Interpretation
1. The raw follow-up timeout count remains preserved as `3`.
2. The hygiene-aware layer shows that none of these three records should remain grouped as hard unreadable sources.
3. Two timeout records are better understood as budget-sensitive pass candidates.
4. `sweep-040-scene` is better understood as a budget-sensitive fail-closed candidate, not as a persistent unreadable source.
5. Future reconciliation and coverage reporting should use both views together:
- raw timeout count
- hygiene-aware timeout interpretation
## Conclusion
Timeout rerun hygiene is now integrated into a reconciliation-friendly reporting layer.
This integration is reporting-only. It does not update scene status, execution board state, or promotion state.
The next use of this integration should be inside future sweep/reconciliation reporting so raw `source-unreadable` and hygiene-aware timeout interpretation are published together.