112 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
112 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
# G6 Real-Sample Entry Preparation And Bounded Execution Design
|
|
|
|
> Date: 2026-04-19
|
|
> Status: Draft
|
|
> Replaces Further G6 Micro-Planning: use this design as the single surviving `G6` design reference
|
|
|
|
## 1. Intent
|
|
|
|
This design replaces the previous over-split `G6` micro-planning chain with one implementation-oriented bounded design.
|
|
|
|
The target is:
|
|
|
|
`G6 real-sample entry preparation and bounded execution`
|
|
|
|
## 2. Why This Redesign Exists
|
|
|
|
The prior `G6` work was split too finely into:
|
|
|
|
1. prerequisites
|
|
2. execution semantics
|
|
3. callback semantics
|
|
4. callback-state verification
|
|
5. entry readiness
|
|
6. entry gate
|
|
|
|
That chain produced useful conclusions, but it also created planning recursion.
|
|
|
|
This redesign stops that recursion.
|
|
|
|
The older `G6` planning documents are now treated only as input material, not as separate execution tracks.
|
|
|
|
## 3. Preserved Inputs
|
|
|
|
The only conclusions preserved from the earlier `G6` planning chain are:
|
|
|
|
1. `G6` already has classification, family preservation, and a minimum runtime-contract shape
|
|
2. the remaining pressure is `host bridge real execution semantics`
|
|
3. callback completion states are already explicit:
|
|
- `blocked`
|
|
- `error`
|
|
- `partial`
|
|
- `ok`
|
|
4. the future `G6` fail-close reasons are already explicit:
|
|
- `g6_bridge_invocation_semantics_missing`
|
|
- `g6_callback_completion_semantics_missing`
|
|
- `g6_callback_state_targets_missing`
|
|
|
|
No further `G6` semantic sub-plans should be opened for the same topic.
|
|
|
|
## 4. Scope Boundary
|
|
|
|
This design is limited to one bounded `G6` mainline preparation-and-execution slice.
|
|
|
|
It may include:
|
|
|
|
1. freezing one final `G6` entry gate
|
|
2. implementing one minimum host-bridge execution seam
|
|
3. running one fixed `G6` real sample
|
|
4. writing back one bounded validation result
|
|
|
|
It must not include:
|
|
|
|
1. opening more `G6` semantic sub-plans
|
|
2. reopening `G7`
|
|
3. opening `G8`
|
|
4. opening `G4 / G5`
|
|
5. broad host-runtime platform redesign
|
|
6. multi-sample `G6` family expansion
|
|
|
|
## 5. Fixed Target
|
|
|
|
This design allows only one `G6` fixed real-sample anchor.
|
|
|
|
The exact sample must remain the existing `G6` representative real sample already referenced by current boundary-family materials.
|
|
|
|
No second `G6` real sample may be introduced under this design.
|
|
|
|
## 6. Target Outcome
|
|
|
|
The bounded target outcome is only one of two states:
|
|
|
|
1. `executed-pass`
|
|
2. `named mismatch`
|
|
|
|
The design explicitly rejects a third outcome of “write another semantic clarification plan”.
|
|
|
|
## 7. Stop Conditions
|
|
|
|
This redesign introduces hard stop conditions:
|
|
|
|
1. once the fixed `G6` real sample is executed, no new `G6` semantic sub-plan may be created
|
|
2. if the result is `mismatch`, only an implementation correction plan may follow
|
|
3. if the result is `executed-pass`, the `G6` line closes immediately
|
|
|
|
## 8. Execution Shape
|
|
|
|
The single surviving `G6` execution shape is:
|
|
|
|
1. freeze the final entry gate
|
|
2. implement the minimum host-bridge execution seam
|
|
3. run the fixed real sample once
|
|
4. update validation assets and close
|
|
|
|
## 9. Exit Condition
|
|
|
|
This design is complete when one bounded plan exists that:
|
|
|
|
1. freezes the final `G6` gate
|
|
2. moves directly into implementation
|
|
3. runs one fixed real sample
|
|
4. closes with `executed-pass` or `named mismatch`
|