Files
claw/docs/superpowers/reports/2026-04-19-g6-host-bridge-execution-semantics-report.md

37 lines
940 B
Markdown

# G6 Host-Bridge Execution Semantics Report
> Date: 2026-04-19
> Plan: [2026-04-19-g6-host-bridge-execution-semantics-plan.md](D:/data/ideaSpace/rust/sgClaw/claw-new/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-19-g6-host-bridge-execution-semantics-plan.md)
## Result
This bounded slice separates the `G6` blocked capability into two explicit semantics:
1. `host-bridge-action-invocation`
2. `callback-request-completion`
## What Was Isolated
The existing generated `G6` runtime shape already exposes two semantic seams:
1. `invokeHostBridge`
2. `callbackEndpoints` and callback result accumulation
So this slice does not treat `G6` as a broad runtime-platform gap anymore.
It treats `G6` as a bounded semantic modeling problem.
## Explicit Non-Goal
This slice does not broaden into:
1. host-runtime transport rebuild
2. `G6` real-sample execution
3. `G8` work
## Follow-Up
The next bounded step is:
1. `G6 host-bridge callback semantics`