52 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
52 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
# Final 2 Residual Child Plan Sequence Design
|
|
|
|
> Date: 2026-04-19
|
|
> Parent Framework: `2026-04-19-scene-skill-102-full-coverage-framework-plan.md`
|
|
> Parent Layer: `Layer E / Route 5 + Route 6`
|
|
> Upstream Board State: `framework-auto-pass = 100`, `framework-structured-fail-closed = 2`
|
|
|
|
## Intent
|
|
|
|
Define the remaining bounded plan sequence after local-doc runtime closure. Only two framework structured fail-closed residuals remain:
|
|
|
|
1. `sweep-085-scene`: `host_bridge_workflow`, next action `future-host-bridge-runtime-roadmap-input`
|
|
2. `sweep-091-scene`: `page_state_eval`, next action `future-bootstrap-target-normalization-roadmap-input`
|
|
|
|
This sequence prevents drift back into prior G6 micro-plans. Every next step must be anchored to this final-2 residual sequence and the 102 full coverage parent framework.
|
|
|
|
## Design Rules
|
|
|
|
1. Do not reuse the old G6 semantics micro-plan chain as an execution path.
|
|
2. Do not start host-bridge and bootstrap work in the same implementation plan.
|
|
3. Do not update the official board inside diagnostic or implementation plans.
|
|
4. Do not add a new family.
|
|
5. Do not modify unrelated mainline contracts for G1-E, G2, or G3.
|
|
6. Any implementation must target exactly one residual scene unless a later parent-framework revision expands the fixed input bucket.
|
|
|
|
## Sequence
|
|
|
|
1. `Final 2 Residual Roadmap Prioritization`
|
|
Decide which residual enters implementation first.
|
|
|
|
2. `Bootstrap Target Normalization Roadmap`
|
|
Bounded roadmap for `sweep-091-scene`, if selected by prioritization.
|
|
|
|
3. `Host-Bridge Runtime Roadmap`
|
|
Bounded roadmap for `sweep-085-scene`, if selected by prioritization.
|
|
|
|
4. `Final 2 Official Board Reconciliation Refresh`
|
|
Consume the selected roadmap output and update only framework-layer board fields.
|
|
|
|
5. `102 Framework Closure Rollup`
|
|
Publish the final 102-status view after both residuals are closed or explicitly held.
|
|
|
|
## Expected End State
|
|
|
|
The target end state is one of:
|
|
|
|
1. `102 framework-auto-pass`, `0 structured fail-closed`
|
|
2. `101 framework-auto-pass`, `1 structured fail-closed with named runtime hold`
|
|
3. `100 framework-auto-pass`, `2 structured fail-closed with named runtime holds`
|
|
|
|
The third state is allowed only if both residuals are explicitly held by bounded decision plans.
|