3.3 KiB
3.3 KiB
Remaining Route Conflict Correction Design
Date: 2026-04-19 Status: Draft Upstream Report:
docs/superpowers/reports/2026-04-19-102-full-sweep-improvement-coverage-delta-report.md
Design Intent
Resolve the remaining 4 route conflicts from the follow-up 102 sweep without reopening the broader full-sweep improvement roadmap.
The design answers:
which of the remaining G3/G2 vs host_bridge_workflow conflicts should be corrected, and which should be formally adjudicated as valid host-bridge workflows?
Fixed Input
The fixed input set is exactly the 4 misclassified records from tests/fixtures/generated_scene/full_sweep_improvement_followup_2026-04-19.json:
| Scene | Expected group | Expected archetype | Current inferred archetype |
|---|---|---|---|
95598报修工单日管控 |
G3 |
paginated_enrichment |
host_bridge_workflow |
95598重要服务事项报备统计表 |
G3 |
paginated_enrichment |
host_bridge_workflow |
台区线损台区月度高负损预测 |
G2 |
multi_mode_request |
host_bridge_workflow |
配网支撑月报(95598抢修统计报表) |
G3 |
paginated_enrichment |
host_bridge_workflow |
Scope Guardrails
- do not add new scene families
- do not reopen timeout work
- do not reopen readiness-before-report work
- do not update
scene_execution_board_2026-04-18.json - do not promote scenes automatically
- do not weaken
G6host-bridge real-sample pass - do not weaken
G2orG3canonical / real-sample pass - do not make
host_bridge_workflowlose when it is the only complete contract
Route Decision Model
Each conflict must be assigned exactly one final route decision:
route-corrected-to-g3route-corrected-to-g2valid-host-bridge-workflowboard-expectation-staleroute-conflict-unresolved
Evidence Rules
G3 Wins Over G6 Only When
- business endpoint evidence is present
- pagination evidence is present
- response path evidence is present
- at least one of enrichment, join-key, or export workflow evidence is present
- host bridge evidence is subordinate rather than the only execution path
G2 Wins Over G6 Only When
- line-loss / electricity business signal is present
- mode or prediction signal is present
- request contract can be inferred
- host bridge evidence is subordinate rather than the only execution path
G6 Remains Valid When
- host bridge action is the only complete execution path
- callback / localhost dependency dominates the workflow
- business-chain evidence does not close the expected G2/G3 contract
Expected Deliverables
- route conflict decision JSON
- route conflict correction report
- bounded routing regression tests if implementation correction is needed
- follow-up probe result for the same
4records
Completion Criteria
This design is complete when:
- all
4conflicts have explicit final decisions - corrected routes are verified by targeted generation probes
- valid host-bridge cases remain documented rather than forced into G2/G3
- existing
G2/G3/G6regressions still pass
Out of Scope
- full
102sweep rerun unless explicitly required after route correction - timeout optimization
- new family creation
- login / host runtime implementation
- execution board status sync