Files
claw/docs/superpowers/reports/2026-04-19-boundary-runtime-prerequisites-decision-report.md

48 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown

# Boundary Runtime Prerequisites Decision Report
> Date: 2026-04-19
> Roadmap: [2026-04-19-boundary-runtime-prerequisites-roadmap-plan.md](D:/data/ideaSpace/rust/sgClaw/claw-new/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-19-boundary-runtime-prerequisites-roadmap-plan.md)
## Decision
One bounded prerequisite direction is selected:
1. `G6 host-bridge prerequisites`
The following prerequisite direction remains held:
1. `G8 local-doc prerequisites`
## Comparison Result
### G6 Host-Bridge Prerequisites
`G6` is blocked by one clearer prerequisite line:
1. host bridge real-sample execution semantics
That is still platform-shaped, but it is narrower than the combined local-doc burden on `G8`.
So `G6 host-bridge prerequisites` is selected.
### G8 Local-Doc Prerequisites
`G8` is blocked by a broader prerequisite bundle:
1. local document runtime
2. attachment handling
That bundle is heavier than the next bounded slice should absorb.
So `G8 local-doc prerequisites` remains held.
## Result
The roadmap now has one bounded next direction:
1. `G6 host-bridge prerequisites`
This report does not implement the prerequisite.
It only closes the prerequisite priority ambiguity.